Sunday, January 10, 2010

The Metaphysics of Text II

The Textual Chain
The series of occurrences previously mentioned is the broadest sense in which we perceive the Metaphysics. For our purposes -- the whole playing field. If any logical proof has not yet been adequately demonstrated as to illustrate the necessity of the above clauses, trust that it will. We need first, however, presuppose that our aforementioned terms do, in fact, exist in sequence; their definitions intrinsically entwined. That is, if we are to further define our terms, their relation to each other must be agreed upon.
This agreement is the Textual Chain and all manifestations of Text occur within it.
The Textual Chain:
We have then three distinct processes divided by the Productive Object with Intent and Reception being paralleled in the metaphysical space and Production accounting for all physical manifestations.
It is important to note the aforementioned division. Though without too much thought put to elevation. For the initial division of Metaphysics and Production can only assumed to be equal in value and sequence. The Metaphysics tier is composed of our Writer’s intent or projected aim -- the Work, and the Manifested Text of the Reader. The Production tier consists of the initial or accidental Text, as well as the finalized Text of the Productive Object.
There are, of course, two instances of transference. That is from a metaphysical object to a physical object and vice versa. These coincide with the two above illustrated divergences, one being the Writer function in which the Work incidentally constructs the Text, the second being the Reader function in which the Text manifests itself in its Reception. It is important to note here that the Work and the Manifested Text bear no relation outside of their shared ethereal nature.

This all centers on the Productive Object and as such, it will serve as our primary device for analyzing the Metaphysics.

2 comments:

  1. I'm trying. I think you should demonstrate with puppets.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I refer you back to the comments following Metaphysics of Text I and will meet you back here. I hope.

    ReplyDelete